Energy Security suggests that we have insecurity in delivery of energy resources, because the owning countries don't give it or at least not at a price we can afford. Maybe others can afford it and make a good deal with the producer.
As the main target of militarily securing the energy routes is Russia, should NATO attack Russia for selling its gas and petrol to China? Is this the target of the campaign?
Maybe we would damage more by war, than we ever could gain by making fair deals with Russia. Can war really be an option for securing energy resources by attacking Russia?
If the Energy Security should become so important for the NATO members, which other securities are we ready to sacrifice?
- Health Security
- Food Security
- Border Security
- Social Security
- Education Security
- Work Security
- Life Security
Do we want to sacrifice the secure availability of
- fauna and flora in the oceans,
- fauna and flora on land,
- kill the people under tropospheric wind-water routes
Could You ever imagine that someone could rob Your free and secure access on sunlight and cause You become vitaminD deficient?
Could You ever imagine that someone would poison Your breathing air with Tropospheric Aerosol Injection (TAI) dust?
Could You ever imagine that someone could prevent plants from building oxygen (O2) by absorbing carbon dioxide (CO2)?
Could You ever imagine that someone would tell You a fake story about "global warming" by CO2 and You would not realize that rising CO2 means decreasing O2?
Why don't You think?
Why are You so easily distracted and deceived?
Do You know that You don't know anything about science but You are ready to believe anything what is presented as scientific?
Why do You treat science like a faith?
Science is only based on evidence, not on trusting people with fancy titles, heavy sounding names of institutions or any other kind of fake authority!
Why are You blinded in mind and unable to see what cannot be hidden from Your eyes?
Let us think about gas delivery from Russia to Germany:
North Stream pipeline is a very secure and cost effective way for Germany to get natural gas from Russia!
No interference with other countries, no payment of transfer fees!
It is the best affordable way of "energy security" for Germany and "delivery security" for Russia!
It is worth reading the imperial publications about "Energy Security", because the main base of current global empire is on a strange island and far away from all main markets and resources and so imperial access to nearly everything and also to energy is very "insecure"!
Germany’s Ambiguity Toward Russia and Energy Security
The Ostpolitik of Germany was very successful during the cold war. Why should Germany "ditch" it now? Wouldn't that be totally absurd?
Germany is an highly industrialized country and Russia is rich on energy resources! So both depend on each other and complement perfectly!
The Eastern European countries were part of the Ostpolitik and this enabled also a fast transition after the breakup of Warsaw Pact. Germany needs more energy resources than the Easter European neighbors as it is one of the most industrialized countries in the world. Germany has not the same interests like Eastern Europe!
"Then, during a visit to Moscow on October 28, when he [Gabriel] met Putin and Gazprom chief Alexey Miller, he lamented the sorry state of relations between Berlin and Moscow."
The relations of Germany and Russia would be perfect if the global empire on the strange island of USA would not interfere and cause insecurity!
"Gabriel went on to give a spirited defense of the Nord Stream 2 project. This involves the extension of the first Nord Stream gas pipeline network, which was built under the Baltic Sea and allowed Gazprom to transmit gas directly from Russia to Germany. That original project was championed by Merkel’s Social Democratic predecessor as chancellor, Gerhard Schröder. He is now on Gazprom’s payroll."
The government of Gerhard Schröder made many mistakes, the most damaging was the deregulation according the orders of Bankster Empire, but the only good decision he made serving German people was the North Stream project. By working for Gazprom he still serves German interests to gain "energy security" for its industry.
"Gazprom’s ultimate goal is to end Russia’s reliance on Ukraine as its main gas transit route to its lucrative European markets. Russia supplied about 30 percent of Europe’s gas consumption in 2013. About half of Russian gas to Europe crosses Ukraine. The addition of Nord Stream 2 would mean a loss for Ukraine of €1.8 billion ($2 billion) a year in transit fees."
Ukraine is a very insecure country and this was endangering the energy delivery to Germany. For German interests it would also be more profitable to donate the €1.8 billion to Ukraine but totally relinquish the transit of any product across Ukraine! Also Poland and Hungary are very insecure transit countries. Factually by financing the failing other European Union countries Germany is exactly applying that strategy.
"Critics of the plan, led by the Baltic states, Poland, and other Central European countries, recently sent a letter to the European Commission opposing Nord Stream 2. They argued that the new pipeline would contravene the EU’s Third Energy Package, besides locking Gazprom into the European market in a way that could undermine Europe’s energy security and the EU’s proposed energy union."
The global empire is planning and already applying steps to turn the territory between the Baltic and Black Sea into a war zone to split German industry from Russia, China and other Eurasian markets. So the main target of war is Germany! Under this development the North Stream pipelines secure not only the energy delivery but they are also the tools for securing the peace, because as long as Germany gets Russian gas, the German industry, economy and the state cannot be broken!
The "unbundling" is a NLP wording for separation of Germany from Russia and China!
Not Gazprom was "persuaded" by the "rules" but Bulgaria was blackmailed by the EU to stop the construction work for South Stream! The wording "rules" is selfrevealing, that the decision was not based on law, but on political, financial and other pressure!
Be aware, whatever else the empire may impose on Germany to damage its own interests, like some sanctions on Russia and Iran, cutting the natural gas delivery from Russia would be the end of all political class in Germany. They all would be considered as traitors, not find the time to escape to their bribers and would be persecuted, convicted and jailed, because without energy the German industry would have been attacked.
Like Russia means energy, Germany means industry. Germany cannot sacrifice the core of its existence.
"Ukraine’s gas comes from the pipeline that crosses its territory. Germany too would become more dependent on Russian gas, which has accounted for some 30 percent of Germany’s gas needs in recent years."
The suggestion is that Germany would be more dependent on Russia, when it becomes independent from the transit across Ukraine and Poland! :-) The empire must be very desperate about losing control on Russia and Germany, when it needs to invent such dumb constructions!
Germany doesn't need the "few friends" in Eastern Europe, but these countries need German industry as the driving motor of European Union. With getting Russian gas without interference of these neighbors, Germany should also stop financing them, to show the consequences of their treason against European interests!
Following propaganda piece is perfectly exposing as it "connects" NATO, Energy Security, "Climate Change" and anti Russian agitation together.
NATO Energy Security Strategy Crucial to Checking Russian Aggression
"Russian gas supplies are dividing Europe on sanctions. Recognition of the security implications of climate change are becoming widely recognized. NATO can and should play a key role in driving positive on both by building energy security for its members. Including specific, targeted mandates to enable mutual energy security in NATO's mission moving forward would be to both recognize the key challenges of our time and bolster longstanding alliance precepts."
It is funny, when a bad manipulator points to one of the imperial manipulation machines (CFR) to support own weak arguments. These countries, depending on Russian gas are neighbors of Russia, separated by Ukraine. Russia is willing to sell its gas to all European countries as long as they can and want to finance it. For Russia, Europe is the next huge market. Why should Russia ever want to stop gas delivery. Russia is trying to circumvent the problematic transition across Ukraine by build North Stream, South Stream and North Stream2. Why should Russia invest so much to deliver, if it did not to sell it?
"The launch of the Energy Security Centre of Excellence in response to recommendations from the 2008 Budapest Summit is a promising development in NATO's institutional awareness of energy infrastructure as a fundamental element of security."
This is a very revealing statement. It is not about "energy security" it is about robbing energy from Russia! If the European Union can get oil and gas from other sources, build by other corporations and countries, who invest at least the same efforts to build pipelines, why should anyone need a military threat by NATO?
Are nuclear bombs and depleted uranium ammunition sources of clean energy?
Is production of petrol and gas by hydraulic fracturing a source of clean energy?
If clean energy means solar panels and wind mills, how should NATO troops protect both from Russian threat? :-)
By pushing the fracking industry in Arabia and Africa the empire wants to build pipelines to Europe and cut the gas and petrol delivery from Russia! This is the "core of the pudel"!
"...measures to increase US and Canadian fossil fuel exports to Eastern and Central Europe ..."
"The progress made in expansive understandings of "security", going beyond the traditional military realm, has been one of the more impressive developments of NATO's mandate since the end of the Cold War. Energy supplies are rapidly being weaponized by exporting nations in an attempt to undermine core NATO objectives. Including specific, targeted mandates to enable mutual energy security in NATO's mission moving forward would be to both recognize the key challenges of our time and bolster longstanding alliance precepts."
The time window of a island based empire is already closed.
The propaganda slogans of the geoengineering mafia mouth pieces sound dumb for the people with knowledge but the bad informed, bad educated and lazy thinking majority swallows easily all arguments connected with "human rights".
Fracking: ‘Gang plank to climate chaos’ or ‘necessary part of decarbonisation’?
"domestically produced" is constructed as a pro argument, just to disguise the damage domestically produced by fracking! Finger pointing to a problem to turn its meaning upside down is a very often used method!
"... the climate benefits of domestically produced shale gas outweigh the risks, argues Stephen Tindale, co-founder of consultancy Climate Answers."
Now one of the human abusing dictatorships is whitewashed, Qatar! The false claims also applies for the the other human abusing and trading golf dictatorships! Sure Qatar donated some money for these sentences!
"The International Trades Union Congress has done an excellent report on Qatar, which says that however good the direct employer tries to be it is effectively a slave labour economy. To me, supporting a slave labour economy by trading is wrong. So I think the human rights case on importing gas from Qatar needs to be answered."
And other states without the properties of the human abusers are put under bad light! The geoengineering propagandists are totally shameless! They are opinion whores, ready to write everything for money!
"Russia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, all these potential places that we could import from, they have very problematic human rights records."
Global Issues: Energy Security
The Laughing Gas War
The Washingtonians’ clown act involves pretending, in all seriousness, that they are going to stop Russia from supplying Europe with natural gas and to take over this market themselves, which they plan to supply with their liquefied natural gas exports obtained through fracking. (Conventional natural gas resources in the US have peaked and shale gas obtainable through fracking is all that is left.)"