- Are the pilots knowingly involved?
- What makes pilots so dumb?
- Don't they know that SRM chemtrails are dangerous for health?
- Why are the aviation companies taking part?
- Reports about aerotoxic syndrome
- Further explaining articles
- Some pictures with chemtrail sprayers:
When talking about Geoengineering and Chemtrails, the listeners impatiently ask categorical questions, without wanting to learn about the boring technical facts, detailed evidence and scientific background. I want to offer the answers:
1. Are the pilots knowingly involved?
The majority of the pilots doesn't have enough knowledge to be intentional perpetrators! The ignorance is a profound shame of this professional guild! According to their job description they should know and understand it, even if they would use this knowledge only for their own security or because caring for their families, colleagues, not to mention their dumbly trusting passengers!
The pilots are dumb enough to fly through the poisonous aerosol soup and find it "beautiful"!
The mental activity of a pilot in modern passenger jet is less than of a rider on a horse or a driver of a donkey cart. A pilot doesn't see, doesn't do anything and is not able to understand the interrelations.
Pilot is one of the shandy professions of our times. As more people understand how climate control is applied, the dots are connected, but the pilots will be the last ones to get this.
"What a cold front looks like from a plane"
They could quickly isolate the source of this problem, if they were really fit in Meteorology. Obviously they aren't and they have dealt with this discipline only theoretically, just to pass the required exam, without being able to relate to and use it practically.
Which active effort is delivered by a pilot, compared to a bus driver? A pilot doesn't know all parts of his vehicle. He hasn't a rear mirror, which would show him what an airplane releases. He doesn't decide at which air corridor, which height he should fly. He doesn't even need to fly the plane actively.
They are overpayed and oversupplied, at least the ones working for Lufthansa. Why should maggot complain about the speck?
3. Don't they know that SRM chemtrails are dangerous for health?
Because of many cases of "aerotoxic syndrome" with health damages and death, all flight personal are aware that there is something dangerous in the air.
4. Why are the aviation companies taking part?
Macabre, that the airplane manufacturers are blamed for the toxic fume events. It is easier to finger point to another instead of using own expertise, which obviously exists only sketchily. The manufacturers are dependent on fuel like a junkie on drugs. They are unable to defend themselves and become cut off from dope.
It should be clear that all "cheap airlines" have been founded for the implementation of ClimateControl and are financed accordingly, else they could not have been so "cheap" from the start!
The foundation of such "cheap airlines" and the huge investmenst of the Arab dictators into the aviation industry leveraged the legacy companies to fully cooperate with the ClimateControl complex, than now all companies are financed by the benefits of the ClimateControl services. Without that cooperation they would not get chep fuel and subsidies.
This video does not really explain the reason but shows live incidences.
TEASER: Unfiltered Breathed In - The Truth about Aerotoxic Syndrome
Mar 19, 2015
- Pilot Richard Westgate died at 43 after saying 'breathing in toxic fumes'
- Mr Westgate, of Edinburgh, suffered years of ill health before he died in 2012
- He instructed a lawyer to sue BA over alleged health and safety breaches
- Now a new study has found that the pilot did suffer from poisonous fumes
- The study is published in the Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry
- Another BA pilot, Karen Lysakowska, 43, died in 2012 claiming same thing
- Mr Cannon's firm is acting for 25 people who say they have suffered similar
Wieder dicke Luft in Lufthansa-Airbus
von Till Bartels, 22.10.2012, 18:15
http://mobil.stern.de/reise/service/giftige-daempfe-an-bord-wieder-dicke-luft-in-lufthansa-airbus-1913698.html
Lufthansa gesteht Probleme mit giftigen Gasen
Veröffentlicht am 30.09.2012 | Von Per Hinrichs Chefreporter WELT AM SONNTAG
"So beginnt der Kapitän des Germanwings-Airbus A319 seinen Bericht über den wohl unheimlichsten Flug seines Berufslebens: den Beinahe-Crash von Köln am 19. Dezember 2010, auf dem beide Piloten fast das Bewusstsein verloren und der Kommandant die Maschine mit letzter Kraft noch manuell landen konnte. Die 149 Passagiere an Bord des Fluges 753 von Wien nach Köln entgingen nur knapp einer Katastrophe.
Die Bundesstelle für Flugunfalluntersuchungen (BFU) stellt in ihrem jetzt veröffentlichten Zwischenbericht fest, dass der 35-jährige Kapitän „am Ende seiner Leistungsfähigkeit angekommen war“. Sein Erster Offizier, der damals 26-jährige Kopilot, spürte, dass er „anfallende Informationen nicht mehr verarbeiten konnte“."
"Vor allem wissen die Passagiere meist nichts von dem Problem, das schon seit den 50er-Jahren bekannt ist. Die dicke Luft an Bord behandeln die Fluggesellschaften eher im Hintergrund. Ursächlich für die schweren Fälle von kontaminierter Kabinenluft ist die sogenannte Zapfluft, die an den Triebwerken abgenommen wird und die Kabine mit Frischluft versorgt."
"„Das Szenario, welches hätte eintreten können, wenn wir auch nur kurz gezögert hätten, die Masken aufzusetzen, mag ich mir kaum vorstellen“, so der Kommandant. „Ein führerloses Flugzeug mit 149 Menschen an Bord, welches unkonfiguriert das ILS (den Gleitpfad, die Red.) heruntersegelt. Den möglichen Ausgang kann sich jeder selbst ausmalen.“"
'There are hundreds of sick crew': is toxic air on planes making frequent flyers ill?
Kate Leahy Sat 19 Aug 2017 09.00 BSTLast modified on Mon 25 Nov 2019 12.21 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/aug/19/sick-crew-toxic-air-planes-frequent-flyers-ill
"Three years ago, Matt Bass, 34, died suddenly in his sleep. According to his father, Charlie, he had been feeling unwell for a few months. He’d lost weight, had digestive and respiratory problems, and suffered from severe fatigue. Doctors thought he might have Crohn’s disease, but were struggling to reach a diagnosis.
Matt was cabin crew for British Airways, and on the day he died had returned overnight from Accra, Ghana (by cabin crew standards, a relatively short, six-hour flight). He went for a scheduled MRI scan, hoping to get to the bottom of his ill health, then in the evening to a crew friend’s house in Slough for pizza. After a few hours, he said he needed a rest and went to lie down. When his friends couldn’t wake him, they administered CPR. An ambulance arrived and took him to A&E, where paramedics tried to revive him; but he never woke up."
"Aerotoxic syndrome is a little-known term used to describe the symptoms of exposure to contaminated air. It is a controversial diagnosis, and many in the aviation industry are adamant it doesn’t exist. But Mulder, Cannon and other campaigners believe it is responsible for long-term sickness, and even death, in a disproportionate number of people who work as cabin crew and pilots. Aerotoxic syndrome has also been cited as the reason for ill health in passengers in a number of cases. Cannon says he has more than 100 cases on his books, including two frequent fliers. Two of these cases have made headlines. Cabin crew member Warren Brady, 46, died of a heart attack as he slept during a break on a flight from Heathrow to São Paolo in June 2014; his family and friends claimed he had been suffering from severe headaches, numbness in his limbs and mood swings, all symptoms of organophosphate poisoning. Richard Westgate, 43, was a pilot who died in 2012. Before he died, he had begun legal action against his former employer, British Airways."
"Aerotoxic syndrome was so named by a small team of medical researchers in 1999. In their report, Dr Harry Hoffman, Professor Chris Winder and Jean-Christophe Balouet suggested that exposure to contaminated cabin air could result in long-term ill health, and needed further investigation. Since the 1950s, aircraft have used what’s known as the “bleed air” system to filter air through cabins. Air is sucked into the engine compressor (the cold part of the engine) before it is siphoned off into the air-conditioning units, where it mixes with the recirculated cabin air. Problems occur when the oil used to lubricate the combustion parts of the engine heat up and chemicals leak back through damaged or inefficient seals into the compressor – and from there into cabin air. Filters in the air-conditioning units are designed to remove bacteria, viruses and dust. Obvious leaks, identified by smoke or “dirty sock” smells, are known as fume events and can cause acute toxicity, with symptoms ranging from runny nose to memory loss, severe headaches, loss of balance and muscle weakness. But the constant low-level, “silent” seepages are, crew and pilots claim, just as much of a problem."
A long list of poisoning in the airplanes was on this website, but the domain has been closed.
http://www.aerotoxicteam.com/news-flash---vorfalle-und-info.html
6. Further explaining articles
7. Some pictures with chemtrail sprayers:
04.10.2014 14:22 |
04.10.2014 13:41, QANTAS Airways! |
04.10.2014 18:41, again direct comparison of a spraying EMIRATES jet (left side) with a non-sprayer (right). It is the DIFFERENCE which counts!!! |
04.10.2014 18:40, the long EMIRATES-sprayer above and a much higher flying non-sprayer below. |
04.10.2014 18:40, the same EMIRATES-sprayer zoomed in. The Arabs fetch the water with their own planes :-( How do they pay for it? |
04.20.2014 18:35, LAN CARGO, spraying a chemtrail. The sky in the west is nearly covered completely with an aerosol cover. |
04.20.2014 18:37, LAN CARGO, finishing its chemtrail and flying without spraying anymore. By the way, many cargo airlines are involved in the Geoengineering project. |
04.10.2014 18:33, a futuristic painting? No, it is the current chemtrailed sky! |
04.10.2014 18:33, the air, have to be breathed by our children and us. Don't You feel like fish in the dirty water of an aquarium! |
No comments:
Post a Comment